Posterous theme by Cory Watilo

My views on incubators along w/ @mlevchin @georgezachary @paulg in today's wall street journal “@JVascellaro: Are incubators dampening innovation? http://on.wsj.com/t8AVUZ”

http://on.wsj.com/t8AVUZ

Some Fear a Glut in Tech 'Incubators' by Jessica Vascellero

The number of tech incubators has skyrocketed. And that has investors and Silicon Valley entrepreneurs such as Max Levchin concerned.

Mr. Levchin, the PayPal co-founder who later sold start-up Slide Inc. to Google Inc. in 2010, is among a growing group worried that the proliferation of start-up "boot camps" is creating problems for the tech industry, such as a glut of similar companies and too much competition for talent. </p>

In recent years, incubators such as Y Combinator and TechStars have sprung up in the Bay Area and elsewhere. Their number totals nearly 100, according to Y Combinator, up from about four in 2007.</p>

Now the 36-year-old Mr. Levchin, who left Google this year, said he is planning a new venture that works on ambitious ideas that he believes most incubators aren't encouraging through their model, which involves spending relatively little on a lot of early-stage bets instead of investing more in a few bigger ones. Because incubators generally don't keep investing in companies at later financing rounds, they can be biased toward selling the companies early, some investors argue.</p>

Incubators are "designed to reduce risk, while I plan to actively increase risk," he said, adding that the details of the new venture are still in flux.</p>

Some graduates of incubators, sometimes referred to as "accelerators," expressed similar views. Entrepreneur Scott Brown attended Y Combinator in 2008, finding it worthwhile for connections and mentoring. But he said what he incubated there—survey software company Frogmetrics Inc.—didn't progress.</p>

"We ended up with something small and useful and that wasn't something that excited anyone," he said. He later left to work on artificial intelligence company Vicarious Systems Inc. and didn't apply to an incubator because he didn't think it would add much value.</p>

Such attitudes are a sign of caution amid a tech investing frenzy that some investors fear may head south. George Zachary, a partner at venture-capital firm Charles River Ventures, said the flood of incubators reminds him of the late 1990s before the tech bubble burst in 2000, when he saw business plans for companies that aimed to incubate other incubators. </p>

Those who run incubators say their numbers are too small to make or break bubbles and, despite the fact that many of their investments fail, they add value by providing connections and capital to democratize what once was a clubby market.</p>

Incubators are "no more a waste of resources than going to business school," said Paul Graham, who founded Y Combinator in 2005. He said Y Combinator backs big ideas, citing Airbnb Inc., a service recently valued at more than $1 billion that lets users rent rooms in their homes. </p>

Many entrepreneurs continue to flock to incubators. TechStars, with branches in several states, said it received more than 3,000 applications in 2011, up from 1,300 in 2010. </p>

But that growth is sending some early-stage investors to the sidelines. Bill Lee, an investor in more than 30 technology companies—including software start-up Tweetdeck, which Twitter Inc. acquired—said he has stopped investing in very early "seed" financing rounds because incubators have produced ideas that are too "cookie cutter," such as myriad group-buying sites.</p>

"It's the same idea in different flavors," he said. </p>

 

 

 

</div></blockquote><div class="posterous_quote_citation">via online.wsj.com</div>

 

Will Your Mall Be Tracking Your Cellphone Today? | Techland

Jason Alden / Getty Images
Jason Alden / Getty Images

Today, as millions of Americans flock to the malls in pursuit of Black Friday deals, some of those malls will be tracking customers by their cellphone signals.

The technology comes from U.K.-based Path Intelligence, who have installed their FootPath system in shopping centers across Europe and Australia.

It works like this: A network of monitoring units are set up across a mall to track shoppers’ cellphone signals, locating them within a couple of meters. The data is then fed to a central processing center. Afterwards, management can gain insight into their customers’ shopping habits, letting them know which stores complement each other or which pathways have the most foot traffic so they can allocate their maintenance crews and ad posters accordingly.

(MORE: 6 Black Friday Secrets Those Deal Sites Won’t Tell You About)

Great for the malls? Sure. Great for consumer privacy? That’s where it gets complicated.

Path Intelligence’s website states that it does not “intercept any personal information,” including phone numbers, and that it “does not collect or store information about customers that allows for the identification of individuals.”

The worry is that somehow, somebody outside of Path Intelligence might have access to that information, say an intrepid hacker–not to mention, anonymity aside, that there’s something plain creepy about having a faceless company track your every movement.

CNN reports that the two shopping centers will be trying out the FootPath system starting on Black Friday: Promenade Temecula in Temecula, CA and the Short Pump Town Center in Richmond, VA. Both will reportedly post signs telling customers that their phones will be tracked.

There is one way to opt-out of the system: Turn off your phone. Of course, for many people, walking around without a working cellphone is like walking around naked. Faced with two unattractive options—being tracked electronically or not having access to a cellphone—it’ll be interesting to see if anyone avoids the two shopping centers altogether.

While FootPath might initially seem invasive, don’t forget that shoppers share all kinds of information when making purchases online, a fact Path Intelligence CEO Sharon Biggar points out to CNN. It’s true–if you’ve ever bought anything (or, quite frankly, done anything at all) online, marketers already have a trove of information about you.

Is it hypocritical for people who let online retailers track them with cookies to be upset when brick-and-mortar retailers track them via cellphone?

I don’t think so. Plenty of people share their information with Facebook, but many of them freaked out when the short-lived Facebook Places allowed their location to be tagged. I have plenty of friends who let Gmail scan their private emails to target them with ads, but barely any of them let Google Latitude broadcast their exact location to others.

The point is, people kind of freak out when you start tracking their physical location. Information online is abstract; the exact spot where you are standing right now is not. What remains to be seen is whether or not the fear of being tracked will win out over the desire to score good deals.

More: How to Opt Out of Everything Online

 

 

Read more: http://techland.time.com/2011/11/25/will-your-mall-be-tracking-your-cellphone...

go go go! “@zaarly: Thx to @CNNMoneyTech for choosing Zaarly as 1 of the top #BlackFriday apps. @LaurieSegallCNN”

Media_httpi2cdnturner_rimmu
Black Friday lines are brutal, but every year customers brave the elements to wait long hours for the best deals. If you want to score bargain booty but would rather skip the lines, apps like Zaarly offer a solution: hire a minion to wait. Zaarly offered up a how-to guide for using its service to "hack" Black Friday. TaskRabbit, which allows you to outsource your errands, is also fielding Black Friday requests -- everything from companies looking for people to hand out fliers to the traditional "wait in line" appeal.

105 lb woman eats almost entire turkey in 10 mins  - NY Daily News

A 105-pound woman gobbled her way to victory in a Manhattan turkey eating contest on Tuesday, devouring nearly an entire bird in ten minutes.

Competitive eater Sonya (The Black Widow) Thomas, 42, of Alexandria, Va., beat the stuffing out of six fearsome foes, including a man four times her size.

“I left only bone,” she gloated after her win. “I’m so happy.”

Even 400-pound Eric (Badlands) Booker, an MTA subway conductor who holds a world record for pumpkin pie eating, couldn’t keep pace with the petite poultry-eater.

“I’m definitely in awe of her abilities, to be so small and eat so much,” said Booker, 42, of Selden, L.I., who gorged his way to second place Tuesday.

The eating athletes had ten minutes to cram down as much of a 10-pound turkey as they could stomach.

Booker prepared for the event by eating two heads of boiled cabbage Sunday night .

“Your stomach is like a muscle,” he explained. “You gotta train for any sport you do.”

But Thomas, who holds 24 world records for devouring everything from oysters to cheesecake, forgoes any training.

“It’s a mind game,” she said. “If you lose your focus and say you’re getting full and slow down, you lose.”

Nobody used utensils in the frenzied feast. Booker picked his entire bird up with one hand and violently gnawed, a fleck of meat stuck to his cheek.

“I just ripped the bird apart and ate the innards,” he said of his strategy. “I think I ate the wishbone by accident.”

Thomas, a restaurant manager, ate more delicately, stripping away handfuls of meat and stuffing them into her mouth between gulps of water. By the end she had managed to eat 5.25 pounds of meat, almost a pound more than Booker, her closest rival.

She credits the yum factor for her surprising victory.

“I’m not normally a fan of turkey,” she said. “Their turkey today was very tasty, moist and warm. That’s why I ate most of the meat.”

Thomas took home $1,581 in prize money from the contest, sponsored by Wild Turkey 81 Proof.

Some of the cash will pay for the Thanksgiving feast she plans for Thursday.

“I’m gonna eat some Korean food,” she said. “That’s enough turkey.”

bpaddock@nydailynews.com

'); });

Ads by Yahoo!

' title '
' descr '
'); document.write('(' sitehost ')'); } } //-->